Internet Researchers’ Data Sharing Survey
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Youngseek Kim, University of Kentucky
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
17 KB | 07/26/2018 12:19:AM | |
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 17.5 KB | 07/26/2018 12:19:AM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This
study examines how data reuse experience, attitudinal beliefs, social norms,
and resource factors influence Internet researchers to share data with other researchers
outside their teams. An
online survey was conducted to examine the extent to which data reuse experience,
attitudinal beliefs, social norms, and resource factors predicted Internet
researchers’ data sharing intentions and behaviors. A total of 201 responses were used for the final data analysis.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Internet researcher;
data sharing
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Over the world
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
2/22/2016 – 3/31/2016 (Spring 2016)
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
2/22/2016 – 3/31/2016 (Spring 2016)
Universe:
View help for Universe
Internet researchers over the world in early 2016
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
survey data
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
The Internet researchers’ data sharing survey was performed with the
Internet researchers who were registered in the AoIR mailing list. In order to
recruit survey participants, we utilized two different survey strategies.
First, we conducted the survey by distributing it through the AoIR mailing
list. Second, we also sent out personalized survey messages to those who
previously sent any messages to the AoIR mailing list. For the second strategy,
we identified 1,416 potential survey participants and sent emails. Qualtrics,
an online survey program, was employed to distribute the recruitment message,
and the link to the survey questionnaire was included in the recruitment
messages.
From the first approach, a total of 54 partial and full responses were received from February 22 to March 31, 2016. From the second approach, a total of 246 partial and full responses were received from March 3 to March 31, 2016. Among the 54 and 246 responses (from general and personalized message campaign), 21 and 78 responses were removed respectively for the first and second approaches if they missed more than 5% of answers, or they did not answer the data sharing intention questions (outcome variables). Therefore, a total of 201 responses were used for the final data analysis.
From the first approach, a total of 54 partial and full responses were received from February 22 to March 31, 2016. From the second approach, a total of 246 partial and full responses were received from March 3 to March 31, 2016. Among the 54 and 246 responses (from general and personalized message campaign), 21 and 78 responses were removed respectively for the first and second approaches if they missed more than 5% of answers, or they did not answer the data sharing intention questions (outcome variables). Therefore, a total of 201 responses were used for the final data analysis.
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
The response rate was calculated based on the second approach (i.e., personalized message campaign) because we can specify the potential survey participants and actual survey respondents from it. Since 168 valid responses were received from 1,265 potential survey participants, and it indicated a 13.3% response rate (168/1,265=0.1328).
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
The Internet researchers’ data sharing survey was performed with the Internet researchers who were registered in the AoIR mailing list.
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
Online survey with Internet researchers who were registered in the AoIR mailing list
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
web-based survey
Scales:
View help for Scales
This research employed 5-point Likert scales ranging from “Strongly Disagree”, “Disagree”, “Neither Disagree nor Agree”, “Agree”, and “Strongly Agree” for the most of items measuring Internet researchers’ diverse perceptions toward data sharing and data sharing intention and actual behavior. Each construct was measured with multiple items.
Weights:
View help for Weights
No weight method was used.
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Individual
Geographic Unit:
View help for Geographic Unit
Over the world
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.