Replication data for: Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850: Reply
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Jason Long; Joseph Ferrie
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | 08/02/2019 07:54:PM | ||
|
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 08/02/2019 03:54:PM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
We respond to several criticisms by Avery Guest and Michael Hout (2013) and Yu Xie and Alexandra Killewald (2013) to Jason Long and Joseph Ferrie (2013). We do not dispute Guest and Hout's characterization of the importance of total mobility in addition to relative mobility. We find much in their additional analyses that supports our original findings. In response to Xie and Killewald, we discuss the limitations of our data and the conceptualization of mobility.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
N34 Europe: 1913-
N33 Europe: Pre-1913
N31 U.S. • Canada: Pre-1913
J62 Job, Occupational, and Intergenerational Mobility
N32 U.S. • Canada: 1913-
N34 Europe: 1913-
N33 Europe: Pre-1913
N31 U.S. • Canada: Pre-1913
J62 Job, Occupational, and Intergenerational Mobility
N32 U.S. • Canada: 1913-
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.